Read this endorsement released today by the Ontario Court of Appeal.
Para. [2] sent me searching.
The?background to [2]?is here.
Read the first 6 paras., and para. 24,?in the 13th case in the chronological listing. It's 2008 CanLII 27483. I've chosen to not link to it.
Perhaps this case ? and similar others which some of us have been on the wrong side of ? is some answer to the question posed here.
When you see the list, and read the case, you might get an idea why I've framed this posting the way I have.
Share: Email | Save as PDF | Print | Bookmark & Share | 
| 
Make a comment:
Note that some comments may be moderated. If you have not had an approved comment here before, your comment will be held for approval. We are glad to publish comments that address issues raised in the post or other comments on it and that contribute to a fruitful discussion. We do not publish comments that seek to promote commercial products, that make personal attacks, or that seek personal legal advice.
Although we do not require it, we ask that in making a comment you use your full name. You must supply a valid email address, which will not appear with your comment.
Source: http://www.slaw.ca/2012/09/19/what-is-the-solution/
john 3 16 alex smith 49ers miss america 2012 hgtv dream home patriots vs broncos contraband denver vs new england
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.